WagerMintsWagerMintsbeta
Taxes by statePrivate suits only

Kalshi and prediction markets in South Carolina: taxes and legal status

South Carolina taxes gambling winnings and prediction market profits as income (1.99% to 5.21% (2026)). Gambling losses only reduce your state tax if you itemize, and only up to your winnings.

As of October 27, 2026, we found no state lawsuit, order or enforcement letter against prediction market platforms in South Carolina, and no court order stops trading. Where it stands

Checked October 27, 2026 against South Carolina’s tax department, court dockets and regulator records.

South Carolina at a glance

Income tax
1.99% to 5.21% (2026)
Gambling losses
Only if you itemize
2026 federal 90% rule
Not stated yet
Prediction markets
Private suits only

Income tax

How does South Carolina tax gambling and prediction market winnings?

For 2026 (H.4216, signed March 30, 2026), South Carolina taxes income under $30,000 at 1.99%. Income of $30,000 and above is taxed at 5.21% minus $966. The top rate can be cut further if state revenue growth allows.

Net long-term capital gain gets a 44% deduction. Short-term gains get no deduction and are taxed like other income at the regular rates.

Gambling losses

Can you deduct gambling losses in South Carolina?

South Carolina starts from federal taxable income, so gambling losses reduce your South Carolina income only if you itemized on your federal return (Schedule A). The 2025 instructions have no separate gambling-loss rule.

  • South Carolina follows your federal choice, because it starts from federal taxable income, which already reflects the standard or itemized deduction.
  • Under S.C. Code 12-8-530, anyone paying prizes or winnings of $500 or more must withhold a percentage equal to the maximum individual tax rate (5% for corporations). Prizes for spectator sporting events with paid admission are excluded.
  • South Carolina's posted conformity date to the Internal Revenue Code is December 31, 2024, and it is not confirmed whether it adopts the 2026 federal 90% limit.

Timeline · 1 steps

Every step in South Carolina, in order

1 steps since Oct 7, 2025, oldest first. Each links the filing, order or page it comes from.
  1. Oct 7, 2025

    Court · U.S. District Court for the District of South Carolina · South Carolina Gambling Recovery LLC v. Kalshi Inc (Nos. 8:25-cv-12859, 8:25-cv-12867)

    A company that sues to recover gambling losses filed two suits against Kalshi, arguing that South Carolina law lets losses on illegal gambling be recovered. They are private suits and do not limit trading.

    CourtListener docket, No. 8:25-cv-12859

Federal courts

What the federal courts and the CFTC have said

States say prediction market sports contracts are bets that their gambling laws cover, while Kalshi and the CFTC say they are swaps, a kind of derivative that only the federal Commodity Exchange Act and the CFTC regulate. The Third Circuit appeals court sided with Kalshi against New Jersey in April 2026, while the Ninth Circuit (Nevada, August 2026) and the Sixth Circuit (Ohio and Tennessee, September 2026) ruled for the states, all at the preliminary stage. The Fourth Circuit (Maryland) heard argument in May 2026 and had not ruled as of October 27. New Jersey's petition to the Supreme Court, Flaherty v. KalshiEX (No. 26-299), is waiting on Kalshi's response due November 9, 2026, and the Court has not yet said whether it will hear the case. On October 9, 2026 the CFTC proposed a rule defining event contracts as swaps.

  1. Apr 6, 2026

    Court · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · KalshiEX LLC v. Flaherty (No. 25-1922)

    By a 2-1 vote, the appeals court for New Jersey, Pennsylvania and Delaware upheld an order that stops New Jersey from enforcing its gambling laws against Kalshi's sports contracts for now. It found Kalshi likely to win its argument that federal law overrides the state. This is a preliminary ruling, not a final judgment.

    Third Circuit opinion, Apr. 6, 2026
  2. Aug 28, 2026

    Court · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · KalshiEX LLC v. Assad (No. 25-7516)

    A unanimous three-judge panel upheld the order that lifted Kalshi's protection against Nevada, so Nevada may enforce its gambling laws against Kalshi's sports contracts. The court held that sports contracts are not swaps under federal law. It sent Kalshi's election contracts back to the district court. This is a preliminary ruling.

    Ninth Circuit opinion, Aug. 28, 2026
  3. Sep 2, 2026

    Court · Supreme Court of the United States · Flaherty v. KalshiEX, LLC (No. 26-299)

    New Jersey asked the Supreme Court to review the Third Circuit ruling. Kalshi's response is due November 9, 2026 after an extension. Many states, tribes, the NFL and others have filed friend-of-the-court briefs. The Court has not decided whether to take the case.

    Supreme Court docket No. 26-299
  4. Sep 16, 2026

    Court · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Blue Lake Rancheria v. Kalshi, Inc. (No. 25-7504)

    In a case brought by two California tribes, the court held the tribes are likely to win their claim that Kalshi's sports contracts offered on tribal lands break the federal Indian Gaming Regulatory Act, and sent the case back to the lower court. A Lanham Act (false advertising) claim was rejected.

    Ninth Circuit opinion, Sept. 16, 2026
  5. Sep 25, 2026

    Court · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · KalshiEX LLC v. Schuler (Ohio) and KalshiEX LLC v. Orgel (Tennessee) (Nos. 26-3196 and 26-5235)

    A unanimous panel upheld a federal judge's refusal to block Ohio's gambling laws and threw out the order that had protected Kalshi in Tennessee. It held Kalshi's sports contracts are not swaps and, even if they were, federal law does not override the states' gambling laws. The cases go back to the lower courts.

    Sixth Circuit opinion, Sept. 25, 2026
  6. Oct 9, 2026

    Regulator · Commodity Futures Trading Commission

    The CFTC proposed a rule that would expressly define event contracts, including those on sports, politics, culture and weather, as swaps, which would place them under federal rather than state oversight. The public may comment for 30 days after Federal Register publication (91 FR 66022). It is a proposal, not a final rule. The same day the CFTC issued an interim rule excluding casino-style gambling products, such as sportsbook wagers and casino games, from the swap definition (91 FR 65969).

    CFTC press release 9310-26, Oct. 9, 2026
  7. Oct 26, 2026

    Court · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · KalshiEX LLC v. Martin (Maryland) (No. 25-1892)

    No ruling yet. The appeal was argued May 7, 2026 and the parties were still filing supplemental authorities on Oct. 26, 2026.

    CourtListener docket, Fourth Circuit No. 25-1892

Your trades

Kalshi and Polymarket profits in South Carolina

The IRS hasn’t said how prediction market trades are taxed, so you pick one of four federal methods: capital gains, ordinary income, gambling or Section 1256. South Carolina starts from your federal figures, so the method you choose federally generally carries onto your state return. If you report as gambling, the loss rules above apply. The four methods, compared.

Questions

Questions about South Carolina

Does South Carolina tax gambling winnings?
South Carolina taxes gambling winnings and prediction market profits as income (1.99% to 5.21% (2026)). Gambling losses only reduce your state tax if you itemize, and only up to your winnings.
Can I deduct gambling losses in South Carolina?
South Carolina starts from federal taxable income, so gambling losses reduce your South Carolina income only if you itemized on your federal return (Schedule A). The 2025 instructions have no separate gambling-loss rule.
Is Kalshi legal in South Carolina?
As of October 27, 2026, we found no state lawsuit, order or enforcement letter against prediction market platforms in South Carolina, and no court order stops trading. Two private loss-recovery lawsuits against Kalshi, filed by 'South Carolina Gambling Recovery LLC' in October 2025, are listed as open in federal court.
Does the court fight change how my trades are taxed?
No. These cases decide whether a state can license or stop the platforms. None of them decides how your trades are taxed, and trades you already made still count in your tax year.

States with the same rule on losses: Virginia, Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado. All states.

Tax facts checked against South Carolina’s own tax pages on October 26, 2026; legal status on October 27, 2026. Rules and cases change, so confirm with current instructions before you file.

See your own year four ways

WagerMints prices your Kalshi or Polymarket year under all four federal methods, side by side, so you can see what South Carolina is taxing before you file. Free, no account.

Run your report