Kalshi and prediction markets in California: taxes and legal status
California taxes gambling winnings and prediction market profits as income (1% to 13.3%). Gambling losses only reduce your state tax if you itemize, and only up to your winnings.
As of October 27, 2026, no California state order or lawsuit stops prediction market trading. Where it stands
Checked October 27, 2026 against California’s tax department, court dockets and regulator records.
California at a glance
- Income tax
- 1% to 13.3%
- Gambling losses
- Only if you itemize
- 2026 federal 90% rule
- Not stated yet
- Prediction markets
- Tribal suits, no state action
Income tax
How does California tax gambling and prediction market winnings?
California's rates for 2025 run from 1% to 12.3%. An extra 1% Behavioral Health Services Tax applies to taxable income over $1 million, so the top rate is 13.3%.
California taxes short-term gains as ordinary income at the same graduated rates. It has no special short-term rate or exclusion.
Gambling losses
Can you deduct gambling losses in California?
California allows gambling losses only as an itemized deduction, on Schedule CA line 16, and only up to your gambling winnings. California lottery losses are not deductible. The reduction of itemized deductions for high income does not apply to wagering losses.
- California taxes gambling winnings because it starts from federal adjusted gross income. California lottery winnings are excluded from California income, but lottery winnings from other states are taxable. If you reduce income for California lottery winnings, you must also remove related losses from your itemized deductions.
- You can itemize on your California return even if you took the federal standard deduction. Complete a federal Schedule A, check the box in Schedule CA (540) Part II, and attach both.
- Payers must withhold 7% of California-source nonwage payments to nonresidents, including gambling winnings, when they exceed $1,500 in a calendar year.
- It is unclear whether California follows the federal 90% gambling-loss limit from 2026, because California's own Franchise Tax Board pages give conflicting answers.
Legal status
Is prediction market trading legal in California?
As of October 27, 2026, no California state order or lawsuit stops prediction market trading. The state attorney general has not sued a platform, but two California tribes won a Ninth Circuit ruling on September 16, 2026 saying they are likely to succeed in barring Kalshi's sports contracts on tribal land. The case went back to the district judge, and no injunction is in force yet.
Where each platform stands
Kalshi
Being fought in courtTwo tribes' federal suit is pending, and the Ninth Circuit said on Sept. 16, 2026 the tribes are likely to win on their claim that Kalshi's sports contracts on tribal land violate federal gaming law.
Robinhood
Being fought in courtRobinhood is a co-defendant in the same tribal suit and the same Ninth Circuit ruling applies to it.
What happens next: The Northern District of California judge must decide the remaining injunction factors for the tribes; no date was confirmed.
Private lawsuits: At least two private suits against Kalshi were filed in California federal courts in 2026: Risch (C.D. Cal., ended June 3) and James (S.D. Cal., filed June 12, motion to dismiss pending).
Timeline · 2 steps
Every step in California, in order
Jul 22, 2025
Tribal suit · U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California · Blue Lake Rancheria v. Kalshi, Inc. (No. 3:25-cv-06162)
Blue Lake Rancheria and other California tribes sued Kalshi and Robinhood, saying sports event contracts offered on tribal land break federal Indian gaming law. The district judge denied their request for a preliminary injunction, and the tribes appealed.
CourtListener docket, Blue Lake Rancheria v. KalshiSep 16, 2026
Court · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Blue Lake Rancheria v. Kalshi, Inc. (No. 25-7504)
A three-judge panel reversed in part, finding the two tribes are likely to succeed on their claim that Kalshi's sports contracts on tribal land violate federal Indian gaming law. It sent the case back so the district judge can weigh the remaining injunction factors, so no order yet stops trading. It affirmed the refusal to enjoin Kalshi's '50 states' advertising.
Ninth Circuit opinion, Sept. 16, 2026
Federal courts
What the federal courts and the CFTC have said
States say prediction market sports contracts are bets that their gambling laws cover, while Kalshi and the CFTC say they are swaps, a kind of derivative that only the federal Commodity Exchange Act and the CFTC regulate. The Third Circuit appeals court sided with Kalshi against New Jersey in April 2026, while the Ninth Circuit (Nevada, August 2026) and the Sixth Circuit (Ohio and Tennessee, September 2026) ruled for the states, all at the preliminary stage. The Fourth Circuit (Maryland) heard argument in May 2026 and had not ruled as of October 27. New Jersey's petition to the Supreme Court, Flaherty v. KalshiEX (No. 26-299), is waiting on Kalshi's response due November 9, 2026, and the Court has not yet said whether it will hear the case. On October 9, 2026 the CFTC proposed a rule defining event contracts as swaps.
Apr 6, 2026
Court · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · KalshiEX LLC v. Flaherty (No. 25-1922)
By a 2-1 vote, the appeals court for New Jersey, Pennsylvania and Delaware upheld an order that stops New Jersey from enforcing its gambling laws against Kalshi's sports contracts for now. It found Kalshi likely to win its argument that federal law overrides the state. This is a preliminary ruling, not a final judgment.
Third Circuit opinion, Apr. 6, 2026Aug 28, 2026
Court · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · KalshiEX LLC v. Assad (No. 25-7516)
A unanimous three-judge panel upheld the order that lifted Kalshi's protection against Nevada, so Nevada may enforce its gambling laws against Kalshi's sports contracts. The court held that sports contracts are not swaps under federal law. It sent Kalshi's election contracts back to the district court. This is a preliminary ruling.
Ninth Circuit opinion, Aug. 28, 2026Sep 2, 2026
Court · Supreme Court of the United States · Flaherty v. KalshiEX, LLC (No. 26-299)
New Jersey asked the Supreme Court to review the Third Circuit ruling. Kalshi's response is due November 9, 2026 after an extension. Many states, tribes, the NFL and others have filed friend-of-the-court briefs. The Court has not decided whether to take the case.
Supreme Court docket No. 26-299Sep 16, 2026
Court · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Blue Lake Rancheria v. Kalshi, Inc. (No. 25-7504)
In a case brought by two California tribes, the court held the tribes are likely to win their claim that Kalshi's sports contracts offered on tribal lands break the federal Indian Gaming Regulatory Act, and sent the case back to the lower court. A Lanham Act (false advertising) claim was rejected.
Ninth Circuit opinion, Sept. 16, 2026Sep 25, 2026
Court · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · KalshiEX LLC v. Schuler (Ohio) and KalshiEX LLC v. Orgel (Tennessee) (Nos. 26-3196 and 26-5235)
A unanimous panel upheld a federal judge's refusal to block Ohio's gambling laws and threw out the order that had protected Kalshi in Tennessee. It held Kalshi's sports contracts are not swaps and, even if they were, federal law does not override the states' gambling laws. The cases go back to the lower courts.
Sixth Circuit opinion, Sept. 25, 2026Oct 9, 2026
Regulator · Commodity Futures Trading Commission
The CFTC proposed a rule that would expressly define event contracts, including those on sports, politics, culture and weather, as swaps, which would place them under federal rather than state oversight. The public may comment for 30 days after Federal Register publication (91 FR 66022). It is a proposal, not a final rule. The same day the CFTC issued an interim rule excluding casino-style gambling products, such as sportsbook wagers and casino games, from the swap definition (91 FR 65969).
CFTC press release 9310-26, Oct. 9, 2026Oct 26, 2026
Court · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · KalshiEX LLC v. Martin (Maryland) (No. 25-1892)
No ruling yet. The appeal was argued May 7, 2026 and the parties were still filing supplemental authorities on Oct. 26, 2026.
CourtListener docket, Fourth Circuit No. 25-1892
Your trades
Kalshi and Polymarket profits in California
The IRS hasn’t said how prediction market trades are taxed, so you pick one of four federal methods: capital gains, ordinary income, gambling or Section 1256. California starts from your federal figures, so the method you choose federally generally carries onto your state return. If you report as gambling, the loss rules above apply. The four methods, compared.
The court cases are about whether California can license or stop the platforms. None of them decides how your trades are taxed. Trades you already made, including positions an order made you close, still count in your tax year.
Questions
Questions about California
- Does California tax gambling winnings?
- California taxes gambling winnings and prediction market profits as income (1% to 13.3%). Gambling losses only reduce your state tax if you itemize, and only up to your winnings.
- Can I deduct gambling losses in California?
- California allows gambling losses only as an itemized deduction, on Schedule CA line 16, and only up to your gambling winnings. California lottery losses are not deductible. The reduction of itemized deductions for high income does not apply to wagering losses.
- Is Kalshi legal in California?
- As of October 27, 2026, no California state order or lawsuit stops prediction market trading. The state attorney general has not sued a platform, but two California tribes won a Ninth Circuit ruling on September 16, 2026 saying they are likely to succeed in barring Kalshi's sports contracts on tribal land. The case went back to the district judge, and no injunction is in force yet.
- Does the court fight change how my trades are taxed?
- No. These cases decide whether a state can license or stop the platforms. None of them decides how your trades are taxed, and trades you already made still count in your tax year.
States with the same rule on losses: Colorado, Delaware, DC, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho. All states.
Tax facts checked against California’s own tax pages on October 26, 2026; legal status on October 27, 2026. Rules and cases change, so confirm with current instructions before you file.
See your own year four ways
WagerMints prices your Kalshi or Polymarket year under all four federal methods, side by side, so you can see what California is taxing before you file. Free, no account.
Run your reportTax sources
- Franchise Tax Board, 2025 Form 540 booklet (rate schedules, conformity, Schedule CA lines 8b and 16, itemizing without federal itemizing, W-2G box 15)
- Franchise Tax Board, Summary of Federal Income Tax Changes, section 70114 (California does not conform)
- Franchise Tax Board, Deductions page (gambling losses)
- Franchise Tax Board, Withholding on nonresidents (7% over $1,500, gambling winnings listed)