WagerMintsWagerMintsbeta
Taxes by stateTribal suits, no state action

Kalshi and prediction markets in California: taxes and legal status

California taxes gambling winnings and prediction market profits as income (1% to 13.3%). Gambling losses only reduce your state tax if you itemize, and only up to your winnings.

As of October 27, 2026, no California state order or lawsuit stops prediction market trading. Where it stands

Checked October 27, 2026 against California’s tax department, court dockets and regulator records.

California at a glance

Income tax
1% to 13.3%
Gambling losses
Only if you itemize
2026 federal 90% rule
Not stated yet
Prediction markets
Tribal suits, no state action

Income tax

How does California tax gambling and prediction market winnings?

California's rates for 2025 run from 1% to 12.3%. An extra 1% Behavioral Health Services Tax applies to taxable income over $1 million, so the top rate is 13.3%.

California taxes short-term gains as ordinary income at the same graduated rates. It has no special short-term rate or exclusion.

Gambling losses

Can you deduct gambling losses in California?

California allows gambling losses only as an itemized deduction, on Schedule CA line 16, and only up to your gambling winnings. California lottery losses are not deductible. The reduction of itemized deductions for high income does not apply to wagering losses.

  • California taxes gambling winnings because it starts from federal adjusted gross income. California lottery winnings are excluded from California income, but lottery winnings from other states are taxable. If you reduce income for California lottery winnings, you must also remove related losses from your itemized deductions.
  • You can itemize on your California return even if you took the federal standard deduction. Complete a federal Schedule A, check the box in Schedule CA (540) Part II, and attach both.
  • Payers must withhold 7% of California-source nonwage payments to nonresidents, including gambling winnings, when they exceed $1,500 in a calendar year.
  • It is unclear whether California follows the federal 90% gambling-loss limit from 2026, because California's own Franchise Tax Board pages give conflicting answers.

Timeline · 2 steps

Every step in California, in order

2 steps since Jul 22, 2025, oldest first. Each links the filing, order or page it comes from.
  1. Jul 22, 2025

    Tribal suit · U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California · Blue Lake Rancheria v. Kalshi, Inc. (No. 3:25-cv-06162)

    Blue Lake Rancheria and other California tribes sued Kalshi and Robinhood, saying sports event contracts offered on tribal land break federal Indian gaming law. The district judge denied their request for a preliminary injunction, and the tribes appealed.

    CourtListener docket, Blue Lake Rancheria v. Kalshi
  2. Sep 16, 2026

    Court · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Blue Lake Rancheria v. Kalshi, Inc. (No. 25-7504)

    A three-judge panel reversed in part, finding the two tribes are likely to succeed on their claim that Kalshi's sports contracts on tribal land violate federal Indian gaming law. It sent the case back so the district judge can weigh the remaining injunction factors, so no order yet stops trading. It affirmed the refusal to enjoin Kalshi's '50 states' advertising.

    Ninth Circuit opinion, Sept. 16, 2026

Federal courts

What the federal courts and the CFTC have said

States say prediction market sports contracts are bets that their gambling laws cover, while Kalshi and the CFTC say they are swaps, a kind of derivative that only the federal Commodity Exchange Act and the CFTC regulate. The Third Circuit appeals court sided with Kalshi against New Jersey in April 2026, while the Ninth Circuit (Nevada, August 2026) and the Sixth Circuit (Ohio and Tennessee, September 2026) ruled for the states, all at the preliminary stage. The Fourth Circuit (Maryland) heard argument in May 2026 and had not ruled as of October 27. New Jersey's petition to the Supreme Court, Flaherty v. KalshiEX (No. 26-299), is waiting on Kalshi's response due November 9, 2026, and the Court has not yet said whether it will hear the case. On October 9, 2026 the CFTC proposed a rule defining event contracts as swaps.

  1. Apr 6, 2026

    Court · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · KalshiEX LLC v. Flaherty (No. 25-1922)

    By a 2-1 vote, the appeals court for New Jersey, Pennsylvania and Delaware upheld an order that stops New Jersey from enforcing its gambling laws against Kalshi's sports contracts for now. It found Kalshi likely to win its argument that federal law overrides the state. This is a preliminary ruling, not a final judgment.

    Third Circuit opinion, Apr. 6, 2026
  2. Aug 28, 2026

    Court · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · KalshiEX LLC v. Assad (No. 25-7516)

    A unanimous three-judge panel upheld the order that lifted Kalshi's protection against Nevada, so Nevada may enforce its gambling laws against Kalshi's sports contracts. The court held that sports contracts are not swaps under federal law. It sent Kalshi's election contracts back to the district court. This is a preliminary ruling.

    Ninth Circuit opinion, Aug. 28, 2026
  3. Sep 2, 2026

    Court · Supreme Court of the United States · Flaherty v. KalshiEX, LLC (No. 26-299)

    New Jersey asked the Supreme Court to review the Third Circuit ruling. Kalshi's response is due November 9, 2026 after an extension. Many states, tribes, the NFL and others have filed friend-of-the-court briefs. The Court has not decided whether to take the case.

    Supreme Court docket No. 26-299
  4. Sep 16, 2026

    Court · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Blue Lake Rancheria v. Kalshi, Inc. (No. 25-7504)

    In a case brought by two California tribes, the court held the tribes are likely to win their claim that Kalshi's sports contracts offered on tribal lands break the federal Indian Gaming Regulatory Act, and sent the case back to the lower court. A Lanham Act (false advertising) claim was rejected.

    Ninth Circuit opinion, Sept. 16, 2026
  5. Sep 25, 2026

    Court · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · KalshiEX LLC v. Schuler (Ohio) and KalshiEX LLC v. Orgel (Tennessee) (Nos. 26-3196 and 26-5235)

    A unanimous panel upheld a federal judge's refusal to block Ohio's gambling laws and threw out the order that had protected Kalshi in Tennessee. It held Kalshi's sports contracts are not swaps and, even if they were, federal law does not override the states' gambling laws. The cases go back to the lower courts.

    Sixth Circuit opinion, Sept. 25, 2026
  6. Oct 9, 2026

    Regulator · Commodity Futures Trading Commission

    The CFTC proposed a rule that would expressly define event contracts, including those on sports, politics, culture and weather, as swaps, which would place them under federal rather than state oversight. The public may comment for 30 days after Federal Register publication (91 FR 66022). It is a proposal, not a final rule. The same day the CFTC issued an interim rule excluding casino-style gambling products, such as sportsbook wagers and casino games, from the swap definition (91 FR 65969).

    CFTC press release 9310-26, Oct. 9, 2026
  7. Oct 26, 2026

    Court · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · KalshiEX LLC v. Martin (Maryland) (No. 25-1892)

    No ruling yet. The appeal was argued May 7, 2026 and the parties were still filing supplemental authorities on Oct. 26, 2026.

    CourtListener docket, Fourth Circuit No. 25-1892

Your trades

Kalshi and Polymarket profits in California

The IRS hasn’t said how prediction market trades are taxed, so you pick one of four federal methods: capital gains, ordinary income, gambling or Section 1256. California starts from your federal figures, so the method you choose federally generally carries onto your state return. If you report as gambling, the loss rules above apply. The four methods, compared.

The court cases are about whether California can license or stop the platforms. None of them decides how your trades are taxed. Trades you already made, including positions an order made you close, still count in your tax year.

Questions

Questions about California

Does California tax gambling winnings?
California taxes gambling winnings and prediction market profits as income (1% to 13.3%). Gambling losses only reduce your state tax if you itemize, and only up to your winnings.
Can I deduct gambling losses in California?
California allows gambling losses only as an itemized deduction, on Schedule CA line 16, and only up to your gambling winnings. California lottery losses are not deductible. The reduction of itemized deductions for high income does not apply to wagering losses.
Is Kalshi legal in California?
As of October 27, 2026, no California state order or lawsuit stops prediction market trading. The state attorney general has not sued a platform, but two California tribes won a Ninth Circuit ruling on September 16, 2026 saying they are likely to succeed in barring Kalshi's sports contracts on tribal land. The case went back to the district judge, and no injunction is in force yet.
Does the court fight change how my trades are taxed?
No. These cases decide whether a state can license or stop the platforms. None of them decides how your trades are taxed, and trades you already made still count in your tax year.