Kalshi and prediction markets in Arizona: taxes and legal status
Arizona taxes gambling winnings and prediction market profits as income (2.5% flat). Gambling losses only reduce your state tax if you itemize, and only up to your winnings.
As of October 27, 2026, a federal court order bars Arizona from enforcing its gambling laws against event contracts listed on CFTC-regulated exchanges, which covers Kalshi, Crypto.com and similar platforms. Where it stands
Checked October 27, 2026 against Arizona’s tax department, court dockets and regulator records.
Arizona at a glance
- Income tax
- 2.5% flat
- Gambling losses
- Only if you itemize
- 2026 federal 90% rule
- Follows it
- Prediction markets
- Federal order blocks state
Income tax
How does Arizona tax gambling and prediction market winnings?
Arizona taxes all income at a flat 2.5% for tax year 2025, for every filing status. The flat rate has applied since tax year 2023.
Arizona taxes short-term gains like other income at 2.5%. The state subtracts part of net long-term gains on assets bought after 2011 (A.R.S. 43-1022), but nothing for short-term gains.
Gambling losses
Can you deduct gambling losses in Arizona?
Arizona allows gambling losses only as an itemized deduction. A.R.S. 43-1042 lets you itemize what the federal code allows, so the federal cap at your winnings applies. If you subtract Arizona lottery winnings and also deduct losses, Arizona Schedule A has an adjustment for that.
- Arizona taxes gambling winnings because it starts from federal adjusted gross income. Arizona lottery winnings have their own subtraction.
- A.R.S. 43-1042 says you may elect itemized deductions instead of the standard deduction. Arizona instructions say to complete a federal Schedule A first. The statute does not say your choice must match your federal return.
- Arizona follows the federal 90% limit from 2026, because A.R.S. 43-105 adopts the Internal Revenue Code as of January 1, 2026 and Arizona itemized deductions follow federal law.
Legal status
Is prediction market trading legal in Arizona?
As of October 27, 2026, a federal court order bars Arizona from enforcing its gambling laws against event contracts listed on CFTC-regulated exchanges, which covers Kalshi, Crypto.com and similar platforms. Arizona's attorney general filed 20 criminal misdemeanor counts against Kalshi in March 2026, but the federal order stops that enforcement while the case continues. The state has appealed to the Ninth Circuit, so the order could change.
Where each platform stands
Kalshi
Court has blocked the stateThe May 5, 2026 federal injunction bars Arizona from criminal or civil enforcement over event contracts on CFTC-regulated exchanges, including the 20-count criminal case against Kalshi.
Crypto.com
Court has blocked the stateCrypto.com's exchange joined the Arizona federal case as a plaintiff, and the injunction covers event contracts on any CFTC-regulated exchange.
Polymarket US
Court has blocked the stateNo Arizona action against Polymarket US was found, and the injunction covers contracts on CFTC-regulated exchanges generally.
Robinhood
Court has blocked the stateNo Arizona action against Robinhood was found, and the injunction covers contracts on CFTC-regulated exchanges generally.
Coinbase
Court has blocked the stateNo Arizona action against Coinbase was found, and the injunction covers contracts on CFTC-regulated exchanges generally.
What happens next: Arizona's Ninth Circuit appeal of the injunction is pending; no argument date was confirmed.
Timeline · 4 steps
Every step in Arizona, in order
Mar 12, 2026
Court · U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona · KalshiEX LLC v. Johnson (No. 2:26-cv-01715)
Kalshi sued Arizona officials in federal court to stop enforcement of state gambling laws against its event contracts, after the Arizona Department of Gaming sent it a cease-and-desist letter.
District court order, May 5, 2026 (recounts the filing and the letter)Mar 17, 2026
Attorney general · Arizona Attorney General · State criminal case against KalshiEx LLC and Kalshi Trading LLC (Arizona state court)
Attorney General Kris Mayes filed a 20-count criminal information against Kalshi for running an unlicensed gambling business and for election wagering. These are misdemeanor charges against the companies.
Arizona AG press release, Mar. 17, 2026May 5, 2026
Court · U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona · KalshiEX LLC v. Johnson (with United States v. Arizona, No. 2:26-cv-02246) (No. 2:26-cv-01715)
A federal judge in Phoenix granted the CFTC a preliminary injunction. Arizona is barred from criminal or civil enforcement of its gambling laws, including subpoenas, over event contracts on CFTC-regulated exchanges. This is a preliminary ruling, not a final judgment.
District court order, May 5, 2026Jul 6, 2026
Attorney general · Arizona Attorney General · KalshiEX LLC v. Johnson (D. Ariz. No. 2:26-cv-01715 (9th Cir. number not confirmed))
Arizona filed a notice of appeal to the Ninth Circuit from the May 5 injunction. The injunction stays in force while the appeal is pending.
Arizona notice of appeal, July 6, 2026 (district court Doc. 107)
Federal courts
What the federal courts and the CFTC have said
States say prediction market sports contracts are bets that their gambling laws cover, while Kalshi and the CFTC say they are swaps, a kind of derivative that only the federal Commodity Exchange Act and the CFTC regulate. The Third Circuit appeals court sided with Kalshi against New Jersey in April 2026, while the Ninth Circuit (Nevada, August 2026) and the Sixth Circuit (Ohio and Tennessee, September 2026) ruled for the states, all at the preliminary stage. The Fourth Circuit (Maryland) heard argument in May 2026 and had not ruled as of October 27. New Jersey's petition to the Supreme Court, Flaherty v. KalshiEX (No. 26-299), is waiting on Kalshi's response due November 9, 2026, and the Court has not yet said whether it will hear the case. On October 9, 2026 the CFTC proposed a rule defining event contracts as swaps.
Apr 6, 2026
Court · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · KalshiEX LLC v. Flaherty (No. 25-1922)
By a 2-1 vote, the appeals court for New Jersey, Pennsylvania and Delaware upheld an order that stops New Jersey from enforcing its gambling laws against Kalshi's sports contracts for now. It found Kalshi likely to win its argument that federal law overrides the state. This is a preliminary ruling, not a final judgment.
Third Circuit opinion, Apr. 6, 2026Aug 28, 2026
Court · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · KalshiEX LLC v. Assad (No. 25-7516)
A unanimous three-judge panel upheld the order that lifted Kalshi's protection against Nevada, so Nevada may enforce its gambling laws against Kalshi's sports contracts. The court held that sports contracts are not swaps under federal law. It sent Kalshi's election contracts back to the district court. This is a preliminary ruling.
Ninth Circuit opinion, Aug. 28, 2026Sep 2, 2026
Court · Supreme Court of the United States · Flaherty v. KalshiEX, LLC (No. 26-299)
New Jersey asked the Supreme Court to review the Third Circuit ruling. Kalshi's response is due November 9, 2026 after an extension. Many states, tribes, the NFL and others have filed friend-of-the-court briefs. The Court has not decided whether to take the case.
Supreme Court docket No. 26-299Sep 16, 2026
Court · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Blue Lake Rancheria v. Kalshi, Inc. (No. 25-7504)
In a case brought by two California tribes, the court held the tribes are likely to win their claim that Kalshi's sports contracts offered on tribal lands break the federal Indian Gaming Regulatory Act, and sent the case back to the lower court. A Lanham Act (false advertising) claim was rejected.
Ninth Circuit opinion, Sept. 16, 2026Sep 25, 2026
Court · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · KalshiEX LLC v. Schuler (Ohio) and KalshiEX LLC v. Orgel (Tennessee) (Nos. 26-3196 and 26-5235)
A unanimous panel upheld a federal judge's refusal to block Ohio's gambling laws and threw out the order that had protected Kalshi in Tennessee. It held Kalshi's sports contracts are not swaps and, even if they were, federal law does not override the states' gambling laws. The cases go back to the lower courts.
Sixth Circuit opinion, Sept. 25, 2026Oct 9, 2026
Regulator · Commodity Futures Trading Commission
The CFTC proposed a rule that would expressly define event contracts, including those on sports, politics, culture and weather, as swaps, which would place them under federal rather than state oversight. The public may comment for 30 days after Federal Register publication (91 FR 66022). It is a proposal, not a final rule. The same day the CFTC issued an interim rule excluding casino-style gambling products, such as sportsbook wagers and casino games, from the swap definition (91 FR 65969).
CFTC press release 9310-26, Oct. 9, 2026Oct 26, 2026
Court · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · KalshiEX LLC v. Martin (Maryland) (No. 25-1892)
No ruling yet. The appeal was argued May 7, 2026 and the parties were still filing supplemental authorities on Oct. 26, 2026.
CourtListener docket, Fourth Circuit No. 25-1892
Your trades
Kalshi and Polymarket profits in Arizona
The IRS hasn’t said how prediction market trades are taxed, so you pick one of four federal methods: capital gains, ordinary income, gambling or Section 1256. Arizona starts from your federal figures, so the method you choose federally generally carries onto your state return. If you report as gambling, the loss rules above apply. The four methods, compared.
The court cases are about whether Arizona can license or stop the platforms. None of them decides how your trades are taxed. Trades you already made, including positions an order made you close, still count in your tax year.
Questions
Questions about Arizona
- Does Arizona tax gambling winnings?
- Arizona taxes gambling winnings and prediction market profits as income (2.5% flat). Gambling losses only reduce your state tax if you itemize, and only up to your winnings.
- Can I deduct gambling losses in Arizona?
- Arizona allows gambling losses only as an itemized deduction. A.R.S. 43-1042 lets you itemize what the federal code allows, so the federal cap at your winnings applies. If you subtract Arizona lottery winnings and also deduct losses, Arizona Schedule A has an adjustment for that.
- Is Kalshi legal in Arizona?
- As of October 27, 2026, a federal court order bars Arizona from enforcing its gambling laws against event contracts listed on CFTC-regulated exchanges, which covers Kalshi, Crypto.com and similar platforms. Arizona's attorney general filed 20 criminal misdemeanor counts against Kalshi in March 2026, but the federal order stops that enforcement while the case continues. The state has appealed to the Ninth Circuit, so the order could change.
- Does the court fight change how my trades are taxed?
- No. These cases decide whether a state can license or stop the platforms. None of them decides how your trades are taxed, and trades you already made still count in your tax year.
States with the same rule on losses: Arkansas, California, Colorado, Delaware, DC, Georgia. All states.
Tax facts checked against Arizona’s own tax pages on October 26, 2026; legal status on October 27, 2026. Rules and cases change, so confirm with current instructions before you file.
See your own year four ways
WagerMints prices your Kalshi or Polymarket year under all four federal methods, side by side, so you can see what Arizona is taxing before you file. Free, no account.
Run your reportTax sources
- Arizona Department of Revenue, news: 2.5% flat rate for tax year 2023 and beyond (found via search summary)
- Arizona Revised Statutes 43-1001 (definitions, Arizona gross income = federal AGI)
- Arizona Revised Statutes 43-105 (Internal Revenue Code definition)
- Arizona Revised Statutes 43-1042 (itemized deductions)
- Arizona Revised Statutes 43-405 (withholding on prize winnings)
- Arizona Revised Statutes 43-1022 (subtractions, long-term gain subtraction)
- Arizona Department of Revenue, Form 140 Schedule A instructions, older years (seen only through search summary; azdor.gov PDFs returned 403)