Courts & regulators
My State Calls Kalshi Gambling. Does That Decide My Federal Tax?
A state calling Kalshi gambling doesn't set your federal tax. What federal law looks at, where state law does matter, and how the court fights could change it.
The WagerMints Team
Prediction-market tax research
November 1, 2026/5 min read
No. A state calling Kalshi gambling doesn’t decide your federal tax. State attorneys general and courts are arguing about who can regulate these contracts. Federal tax turns on federal tax law, and the IRS hasn’t said whether they are wagers. The state’s position can still matter on your state return, and its reasoning could influence the federal argument later.
What decides the federal tax treatment?
The tax code itself. The Supreme Court put the general rule this way in Morgan v. Commissioner(1940), an estate tax case: “State law creates legal interests and rights. The federal revenue acts designate what interests or rights, so created, shall be taxed.” The Court said federal law prevails “no matter what name is given” to the right by local law.
For gambling, the relevant federal rule is Section 165(d), which limits losses from “wagering transactions” without defining the term. The Tax Law Center, writing in Tax Notes Federal in October 2026, says Congress meant the word’s plain and ordinary meaning, and that:
“Neither the courts nor the IRS has explicitly addressed the question of whether sports event contracts are wagers under federal tax law.”
The same applies in the other direction. The CFTC’s October 2026 proposal to define event contracts as swaps says its classifications are for the Commodity Exchange Act, and that “federal tax treatment” is determined under the Internal Revenue Code. So neither a state’s gambling label nor the CFTC’s swap label settles your federal return.
Who decides what?
| Question | Decided under | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Can a state enforce its gambling laws against Kalshi? | The Commodity Exchange Act and state law | Appeals courts are split, and New Jersey has asked the Supreme Court to step in |
| Are event contracts swaps under commodities law? | The Commodity Exchange Act and CFTC rules | Proposed by the CFTC in October 2026 |
| How is your profit taxed federally? | The Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance | No IRS guidance on event contracts |
| How is it taxed by your state? | That state’s tax law | Varies by state |
Could court rulings still affect your federal tax?
They could, indirectly. These rulings aren’t tax rulings, and they don’t bind your return. But the words a court uses can be cited later in a tax dispute.
The Third Circuit ruled for Kalshi against New Jersey in April 2026. The Ninth Circuit (Nevada, August 2026) and the Sixth Circuit (Ohio and Tennessee, September 2026) ruled for the states, and both said sports contracts are not swaps. All of those rulings came at a preliminary stage.
Courts describing sports contracts as bets would help the argument that they are wagers under Section 165(d). The Tax Law Center already says sports contracts appear to be wagers. The swap label cuts against the 60/40 argument for a different reason, since Section 1256 excludes swaps. No one can tell you yet which argument the IRS will take. See how the Supreme Court case could matter.
Does state law ever matter in federal tax?
Yes, when Congress writes it in. The federal wagering excise tax is 0.25% on wagers authorized under state law and 2% on unauthorized wagers. So for that tax, whether a state authorizes the wager changes the rate. It is a tax on businesses that accept wagers, and it isn’t an income tax on your winnings. How the excise tax could reach prediction markets.
What about your state tax return?
Your state return follows that state’s tax law, and many state returns start from a federal figure, so your federal choice can carry through. Two examples, using the states in the current court fights:
- Utah: the return starts from federal adjusted gross income. There is no gambling loss deduction, but itemized gambling losses can raise a credit based on your federal deductions. Utah details.
- Maryland: gambling losses count only if you itemize, starting from your federal Schedule A. Maryland details.
A few states tax prediction markets specifically. The state-by-state picture.
If it’s illegal in your state, is it still taxable?
Yes. IRS Publication 525 says “Income from illegal activities” must be included in your income, on Schedule 1, line 8z, or Schedule C if it comes from self-employment. So a state winning its case doesn’t erase tax on profit you already made.
What should you do?
- Don’t change your federal method because of a state’s press release or a preemption ruling.
- Do look at gambling treatment as a real possibility for sports contracts, and know what it would cost: you itemize to deduct losses, and from 2026 only 90% of losses count, up to winnings.
- Keep your per-trade records, so you can refigure a year if the law moves.
- Check your state’s own rules separately.
WagerMints shows your trades under all four federal methods, so you can see what the gambling reading would cost you before you choose.
Questions about state gambling labels and federal tax
If my state calls Kalshi gambling, do I report it as gambling on my federal return?
Not because of the state's label. Federal tax treatment is decided under federal tax law. The Tax Law Center notes that neither the courts nor the IRS has explicitly said whether sports event contracts are wagers for federal tax.
Does a CFTC swap label decide my federal tax?
No. The CFTC's own proposal says its classifications are for the Commodity Exchange Act, and that federal tax treatment is determined under the Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance.
Does a state gambling ruling affect my state tax return?
It can, but state tax follows that state's tax rules. Check your state's treatment of gambling winnings and losses, and any rule aimed at prediction markets, on its own page.
If Kalshi is illegal in my state, is my profit still taxable?
Yes. IRS Publication 525 says income from illegal activities must be included in your income. A state winning its case wouldn't make your profit tax free.
Should I switch to gambling treatment because of a court ruling?
Don't switch on a headline. The rulings so far are about who regulates these contracts, not how they are taxed. Compare the methods on your own trades, and talk to a preparer if the difference is large.
General information about US tax, not tax advice.
Sources
- Morgan v. Commissioner, 309 U.S. 78 (1940)
- Tax Law Center at NYU Law, "Are Sports Event Contracts on Prediction Markets Gambling for Federal Tax Purposes?", Tax Notes Federal, Oct 5, 2026
- CFTC press release 9310-26, proposed rule on event contracts as swaps (Oct 9, 2026)
- Third Circuit, KalshiEX v. Flaherty, No. 25-1922 (Apr 6, 2026)
- Ninth Circuit, No. 25-7516 (Aug 28, 2026)
- Sixth Circuit opinion, Ohio and Tennessee (Sep 25, 2026)
- 26 U.S.C. §165(d), wagering losses
- IRS Publication 525, illegal activities
Run this against your own trades
WagerMints computes all four methods from your real Kalshi export or Polymarket wallet, side by side. Your trade data is processed in memory, not stored unless you opt in to share it.
Run your reportNew to this? Start with the guide to the four methods or the tax glossary.
Keep reading
All postsNovember 1, 2026 · 5 min read
Do the Utah and Maryland Kalshi Cases Change Your Taxes?
Neither the Utah charges nor the Maryland appeal changes how Kalshi trades are taxed or reported today. Where each case stands and what could change later.
Read postOctober 10, 2026 · 6 min read
The CFTC Wants to Call Event Contracts Swaps. What That Does to Your Taxes
The CFTC wants event contracts defined as swaps. It leaves tax to the IRS, but the label weakens the 60/40 case.
Read postOctober 9, 2026 · 3 min read
The Supreme Court Kalshi Case: What a Ruling Would and Wouldn't Do to Your Taxes
States and the NFL want the Court to hand sports contracts to state regulators. Why that ruling reaches your taxes.
Read post