WagerMintsWagerMintsbeta
Taxes by stateBeing fought in court

Kalshi and prediction markets in Maryland: taxes and legal status

Maryland taxes gambling winnings and prediction market profits as income (2% to 6.5%). Gambling losses only reduce your state tax if you itemize, and only up to your winnings.

As of October 27, 2026, no court order stops prediction market trading in Maryland. Where it stands

Checked October 27, 2026 against Maryland’s tax department, court dockets and regulator records.

Maryland at a glance

Income tax
2% to 6.5%
Gambling losses
Only if you itemize
2026 federal 90% rule
Not stated yet
Prediction markets
Being fought in court

Income tax

How does Maryland tax gambling and prediction market winnings?

For 2025, Maryland state rates run from 2% to 6.5%. Single filers pay 4.75% from $3,001 to $100,000, 5% to 5.75% up to $500,000, 6.25% to $1 million, and 6.5% above $1 million. Joint filers pay 6.25% from $600,001 and 6.5% above $1.2 million.

Counties and Baltimore City add an income tax of 2.25% to 3.30%, collected on the state return and based on where you live.

Short-term gains are taxed like other income at the Maryland rates. From tax year 2025, filers with federal AGI over $350,000 also pay an extra 2% on certain net capital gain (Form 502CG).

Gambling losses

Can you deduct gambling losses in Maryland?

Maryland allows gambling losses only if you itemize. Maryland itemized deductions start from federal Schedule A, line 17, so a federal gambling loss deduction carries over. From 2025, itemized deductions are reduced for filers with federal AGI over $200,000 ($100,000 if married filing separately).

  • Residents and nonresidents are both taxed on winnings from lottery, racetrack betting and gambling.
  • You may itemize on the Maryland return only if you itemized on the federal return. Itemizing federally doesn't require you to itemize for Maryland.
  • Maryland withholds 9.5% for residents and 8.75% for nonresidents on winnings over $5,000 (Comptroller Tax Alert updated July 1, 2025). Horse race pari-mutuel winnings are withheld if over $5,000 and at least 300 times the wager. If you owe tax on winnings over $500 with nothing withheld, pay with Form PV within 60 days.
  • Maryland's itemized deductions copy federal Schedule A, line 17, but the state hasn't said how it treats the 2026 limit.

Timeline · 5 steps

Every step in Maryland, in order

5 steps since Apr 7, 2025, oldest first. Each links the filing, order or page it comes from.
  1. Apr 7, 2025

    Regulator · Maryland Lottery and Gaming Control Commission · KalshiEX LLC v. Martin (No. 1:25-cv-01283)

    The commission sent Kalshi a cease-and-desist letter telling it to stop offering sports event contracts to Maryland residents. A letter is a demand, not a court order.

    D. Md. opinion, Aug. 1, 2025 (describes the letter)
  2. Apr 21, 2025

    Court · U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland · KalshiEX LLC v. Martin (No. 1:25-cv-01283)

    Kalshi sued Maryland gaming officials in federal court in Baltimore, saying federal commodities law blocks the state from enforcing its gambling laws against it. A similar case was filed the same day for Crypto.com (North American Derivatives Exchange v. Martin, No. 1:25-cv-01285).

    CourtListener docket, Kalshiex v. Martin
  3. Aug 1, 2025

    Court · U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland · KalshiEX LLC v. Martin (No. 1:25-cv-01283)

    A federal judge in Baltimore denied Kalshi's request for a preliminary injunction, finding it had not shown federal law overrides Maryland's gambling laws. This is an early ruling, not a final judgment, and it did not itself order Kalshi to stop.

    D. Md. opinion, Aug. 1, 2025
  4. Aug 6, 2025

    Court · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · KalshiEX LLC v. Martin (No. 25-1892)

    Kalshi appealed the denial to the Fourth Circuit appeals court, which heard argument on May 7, 2026.

    CourtListener docket, KalshiEx LLC v. Martin (4th Cir.)
  5. Aug 13, 2026

    City · City of Baltimore · City of Baltimore v. KalshiEX LLC; City of Baltimore v. QCX LLC (Nos. 1:26-cv-03217, 1:26-cv-03252, 1:26-cv-03253 (D. Md., after removal))

    Baltimore's mayor and city council sued Kalshi and Polymarket in the city's circuit court, saying their sports contracts are unlicensed sports betting and break the city's consumer protection ordinance. The cases now appear in federal court in Maryland.

    Baltimore mayor's press release, Aug. 13, 2026

Federal courts

What the federal courts and the CFTC have said

States say prediction market sports contracts are bets that their gambling laws cover, while Kalshi and the CFTC say they are swaps, a kind of derivative that only the federal Commodity Exchange Act and the CFTC regulate. The Third Circuit appeals court sided with Kalshi against New Jersey in April 2026, while the Ninth Circuit (Nevada, August 2026) and the Sixth Circuit (Ohio and Tennessee, September 2026) ruled for the states, all at the preliminary stage. The Fourth Circuit (Maryland) heard argument in May 2026 and had not ruled as of October 27. New Jersey's petition to the Supreme Court, Flaherty v. KalshiEX (No. 26-299), is waiting on Kalshi's response due November 9, 2026, and the Court has not yet said whether it will hear the case. On October 9, 2026 the CFTC proposed a rule defining event contracts as swaps.

  1. Apr 6, 2026

    Court · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · KalshiEX LLC v. Flaherty (No. 25-1922)

    By a 2-1 vote, the appeals court for New Jersey, Pennsylvania and Delaware upheld an order that stops New Jersey from enforcing its gambling laws against Kalshi's sports contracts for now. It found Kalshi likely to win its argument that federal law overrides the state. This is a preliminary ruling, not a final judgment.

    Third Circuit opinion, Apr. 6, 2026
  2. Aug 28, 2026

    Court · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · KalshiEX LLC v. Assad (No. 25-7516)

    A unanimous three-judge panel upheld the order that lifted Kalshi's protection against Nevada, so Nevada may enforce its gambling laws against Kalshi's sports contracts. The court held that sports contracts are not swaps under federal law. It sent Kalshi's election contracts back to the district court. This is a preliminary ruling.

    Ninth Circuit opinion, Aug. 28, 2026
  3. Sep 2, 2026

    Court · Supreme Court of the United States · Flaherty v. KalshiEX, LLC (No. 26-299)

    New Jersey asked the Supreme Court to review the Third Circuit ruling. Kalshi's response is due November 9, 2026 after an extension. Many states, tribes, the NFL and others have filed friend-of-the-court briefs. The Court has not decided whether to take the case.

    Supreme Court docket No. 26-299
  4. Sep 16, 2026

    Court · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Blue Lake Rancheria v. Kalshi, Inc. (No. 25-7504)

    In a case brought by two California tribes, the court held the tribes are likely to win their claim that Kalshi's sports contracts offered on tribal lands break the federal Indian Gaming Regulatory Act, and sent the case back to the lower court. A Lanham Act (false advertising) claim was rejected.

    Ninth Circuit opinion, Sept. 16, 2026
  5. Sep 25, 2026

    Court · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · KalshiEX LLC v. Schuler (Ohio) and KalshiEX LLC v. Orgel (Tennessee) (Nos. 26-3196 and 26-5235)

    A unanimous panel upheld a federal judge's refusal to block Ohio's gambling laws and threw out the order that had protected Kalshi in Tennessee. It held Kalshi's sports contracts are not swaps and, even if they were, federal law does not override the states' gambling laws. The cases go back to the lower courts.

    Sixth Circuit opinion, Sept. 25, 2026
  6. Oct 9, 2026

    Regulator · Commodity Futures Trading Commission

    The CFTC proposed a rule that would expressly define event contracts, including those on sports, politics, culture and weather, as swaps, which would place them under federal rather than state oversight. The public may comment for 30 days after Federal Register publication (91 FR 66022). It is a proposal, not a final rule. The same day the CFTC issued an interim rule excluding casino-style gambling products, such as sportsbook wagers and casino games, from the swap definition (91 FR 65969).

    CFTC press release 9310-26, Oct. 9, 2026
  7. Oct 26, 2026

    Court · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · KalshiEX LLC v. Martin (Maryland) (No. 25-1892)

    No ruling yet. The appeal was argued May 7, 2026 and the parties were still filing supplemental authorities on Oct. 26, 2026.

    CourtListener docket, Fourth Circuit No. 25-1892

Your trades

Kalshi and Polymarket profits in Maryland

The IRS hasn’t said how prediction market trades are taxed, so you pick one of four federal methods: capital gains, ordinary income, gambling or Section 1256. Maryland starts from your federal figures, so the method you choose federally generally carries onto your state return. If you report as gambling, the loss rules above apply. The four methods, compared.

The court cases are about whether Maryland can license or stop the platforms. None of them decides how your trades are taxed. Trades you already made, including positions an order made you close, still count in your tax year.

Questions

Questions about Maryland

Does Maryland tax gambling winnings?
Maryland taxes gambling winnings and prediction market profits as income (2% to 6.5%). Gambling losses only reduce your state tax if you itemize, and only up to your winnings.
Can I deduct gambling losses in Maryland?
Maryland allows gambling losses only if you itemize. Maryland itemized deductions start from federal Schedule A, line 17, so a federal gambling loss deduction carries over. From 2025, itemized deductions are reduced for filers with federal AGI over $200,000 ($100,000 if married filing separately).
Is Kalshi legal in Maryland?
As of October 27, 2026, no court order stops prediction market trading in Maryland. The state's gaming commission sent Kalshi a cease-and-desist letter in 2025 and a federal judge refused to block the state, but the Fourth Circuit appeals court, which heard Kalshi's appeal on May 7, 2026, hasn't ruled. The city of Baltimore also sued Kalshi and Polymarket US in August 2026.
Does the court fight change how my trades are taxed?
No. These cases decide whether a state can license or stop the platforms. None of them decides how your trades are taxed, and trades you already made still count in your tax year.

States with the same rule on losses: Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, New Mexico. All states.

Tax facts checked against Maryland’s own tax pages on October 26, 2026; legal status on October 27, 2026. Rules and cases change, so confirm with current instructions before you file.

See your own year four ways

WagerMints prices your Kalshi or Polymarket year under all four federal methods, side by side, so you can see what Maryland is taxing before you file. Free, no account.

Run your report