WagerMintsWagerMintsbeta
Taxes by stateState case at top court

Kalshi and prediction markets in Massachusetts: taxes and legal status

Massachusetts taxes gambling winnings and prediction market profits as income (5% (8.5% on short-term gains)). It allows gambling losses only in limited cases.

As of October 27, 2026, the Massachusetts attorney general's lawsuit against Kalshi over sports contracts is before the state's Supreme Judicial Court, which is reviewing a lower court's decision against Kalshi. Where it stands

Checked October 27, 2026 against Massachusetts’s tax department, court dockets and regulator records.

Massachusetts at a glance

Income tax
5% (8.5% on short-term gains)
Gambling losses
Limited
2026 federal 90% rule
Doesn't follow it
Prediction markets
State case at top court

Income tax

How does Massachusetts tax gambling and prediction market winnings?

Massachusetts taxes most income at 5% for 2026, including long-term capital gains. Short-term capital gains are taxed at 8.5% and collectibles gains at 12% (with a 50% deduction). A 4% surtax applies to income over $1,107,750 for 2026 ($1,083,150 for 2025).

Short-term capital gains are taxed at 8.5% (12% before 2023). Capital losses offset capital gains and up to $2,000 of interest and dividends, but not other ordinary income.

Gambling losses

Can you deduct gambling losses in Massachusetts?

Massachusetts allows a limited deduction for gambling losses. Only losses at a casino licensed under MGL ch. 23K, a racing or simulcasting licensee, or (from 2024) a sports wagering operator licensed under ch. 23N count, and only up to winnings from those sources. Losses at out-of-state casinos, with non-Massachusetts operators, and on the Massachusetts state lottery are not deductible.

  • Sports wagering winnings and winnings from casinos, raffles, races and other events of chance, wherever held, and winnings from non-Massachusetts lotteries go on Schedule X, line 3. Massachusetts state lottery winnings go on Form 1, line 8b.
  • This is not an itemized deduction. It comes off 5% income on Schedule Y, line 17, and the instructions don't tie it to federal itemizing.
  • Massachusetts has its own gambling loss deduction and doesn't adopt IRC 165(d), so the federal 90% limit isn't part of it.

Timeline · 6 steps

Every step in Massachusetts, in order

6 steps since Sep 15, 2025, oldest first. Each links the filing, order or page it comes from.
  1. Sep 15, 2025

    Court · U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts · Robinhood Derivatives, LLC v. Campbell (No. 1:25-cv-12578)

    Robinhood Derivatives sued the Massachusetts attorney general in federal court. The case was closed on March 13, 2026, and Robinhood appealed to the First Circuit (No. 26-1257, opened March 23, 2026).

    CourtListener docket, Robinhood Derivatives v. Campbell
  2. Sep 16, 2025

    Court · U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts · Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. KalshiEX LLC (No. 1:25-cv-12595)

    Massachusetts' case against Kalshi, filed in state court, was moved to federal court. The federal docket shows it closed on October 28, 2025, when it went back to the state court.

    CourtListener docket, Commonwealth v. KalshiEX
  3. Feb 9, 2026

    Court · U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts · QCX LLC v. Campbell (No. 1:26-cv-10651)

    Polymarket US sued the Massachusetts attorney general in federal court. The case was closed on March 5, 2026.

    CourtListener docket, QCX v. Campbell
  4. Apr 24, 2026

    Court · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. KalshiEx LLC (SJC-13906)

    The CFTC filed a friend-of-the-court brief arguing federal law governs Kalshi's contracts, in the Supreme Judicial Court's review of the lower court's decision against Kalshi. A separate brief from 38 attorneys general backs Massachusetts. Neither changes what traders can do.

    CFTC press release on its SJC amicus brief
  5. Aug 6, 2026

    Court · U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts · Ludlow Exchange, LLC v. Campbell (No. 1:26-cv-13615)

    Novig's operator sued the Massachusetts attorney general in federal court.

    CourtListener docket, Ludlow Exchange v. Campbell
  6. Sep 8, 2026

    Court · U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts · Underdog Exchange DCM, Inc. v. Campbell (No. 1:26-cv-14098)

    Underdog's exchange sued the Massachusetts attorney general in federal court.

    CourtListener docket, Underdog v. Campbell

Federal courts

What the federal courts and the CFTC have said

States say prediction market sports contracts are bets that their gambling laws cover, while Kalshi and the CFTC say they are swaps, a kind of derivative that only the federal Commodity Exchange Act and the CFTC regulate. The Third Circuit appeals court sided with Kalshi against New Jersey in April 2026, while the Ninth Circuit (Nevada, August 2026) and the Sixth Circuit (Ohio and Tennessee, September 2026) ruled for the states, all at the preliminary stage. The Fourth Circuit (Maryland) heard argument in May 2026 and had not ruled as of October 27. New Jersey's petition to the Supreme Court, Flaherty v. KalshiEX (No. 26-299), is waiting on Kalshi's response due November 9, 2026, and the Court has not yet said whether it will hear the case. On October 9, 2026 the CFTC proposed a rule defining event contracts as swaps.

  1. Apr 6, 2026

    Court · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · KalshiEX LLC v. Flaherty (No. 25-1922)

    By a 2-1 vote, the appeals court for New Jersey, Pennsylvania and Delaware upheld an order that stops New Jersey from enforcing its gambling laws against Kalshi's sports contracts for now. It found Kalshi likely to win its argument that federal law overrides the state. This is a preliminary ruling, not a final judgment.

    Third Circuit opinion, Apr. 6, 2026
  2. Aug 28, 2026

    Court · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · KalshiEX LLC v. Assad (No. 25-7516)

    A unanimous three-judge panel upheld the order that lifted Kalshi's protection against Nevada, so Nevada may enforce its gambling laws against Kalshi's sports contracts. The court held that sports contracts are not swaps under federal law. It sent Kalshi's election contracts back to the district court. This is a preliminary ruling.

    Ninth Circuit opinion, Aug. 28, 2026
  3. Sep 2, 2026

    Court · Supreme Court of the United States · Flaherty v. KalshiEX, LLC (No. 26-299)

    New Jersey asked the Supreme Court to review the Third Circuit ruling. Kalshi's response is due November 9, 2026 after an extension. Many states, tribes, the NFL and others have filed friend-of-the-court briefs. The Court has not decided whether to take the case.

    Supreme Court docket No. 26-299
  4. Sep 16, 2026

    Court · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Blue Lake Rancheria v. Kalshi, Inc. (No. 25-7504)

    In a case brought by two California tribes, the court held the tribes are likely to win their claim that Kalshi's sports contracts offered on tribal lands break the federal Indian Gaming Regulatory Act, and sent the case back to the lower court. A Lanham Act (false advertising) claim was rejected.

    Ninth Circuit opinion, Sept. 16, 2026
  5. Sep 25, 2026

    Court · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · KalshiEX LLC v. Schuler (Ohio) and KalshiEX LLC v. Orgel (Tennessee) (Nos. 26-3196 and 26-5235)

    A unanimous panel upheld a federal judge's refusal to block Ohio's gambling laws and threw out the order that had protected Kalshi in Tennessee. It held Kalshi's sports contracts are not swaps and, even if they were, federal law does not override the states' gambling laws. The cases go back to the lower courts.

    Sixth Circuit opinion, Sept. 25, 2026
  6. Oct 9, 2026

    Regulator · Commodity Futures Trading Commission

    The CFTC proposed a rule that would expressly define event contracts, including those on sports, politics, culture and weather, as swaps, which would place them under federal rather than state oversight. The public may comment for 30 days after Federal Register publication (91 FR 66022). It is a proposal, not a final rule. The same day the CFTC issued an interim rule excluding casino-style gambling products, such as sportsbook wagers and casino games, from the swap definition (91 FR 65969).

    CFTC press release 9310-26, Oct. 9, 2026
  7. Oct 26, 2026

    Court · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · KalshiEX LLC v. Martin (Maryland) (No. 25-1892)

    No ruling yet. The appeal was argued May 7, 2026 and the parties were still filing supplemental authorities on Oct. 26, 2026.

    CourtListener docket, Fourth Circuit No. 25-1892

Your trades

Kalshi and Polymarket profits in Massachusetts

The IRS hasn’t said how prediction market trades are taxed, so you pick one of four federal methods: capital gains, ordinary income, gambling or Section 1256. Massachusetts uses its own definitions, so check how it treats the method you choose federally. If you report as gambling, the loss rules above apply. The four methods, compared.

The court cases are about whether Massachusetts can license or stop the platforms. None of them decides how your trades are taxed. Trades you already made, including positions an order made you close, still count in your tax year.

Questions

Questions about Massachusetts

Does Massachusetts tax gambling winnings?
Massachusetts taxes gambling winnings and prediction market profits as income (5% (8.5% on short-term gains)). It allows gambling losses only in limited cases.
Can I deduct gambling losses in Massachusetts?
Massachusetts allows a limited deduction for gambling losses. Only losses at a casino licensed under MGL ch. 23K, a racing or simulcasting licensee, or (from 2024) a sports wagering operator licensed under ch. 23N count, and only up to winnings from those sources. Losses at out-of-state casinos, with non-Massachusetts operators, and on the Massachusetts state lottery are not deductible.
Is Kalshi legal in Massachusetts?
As of October 27, 2026, the Massachusetts attorney general's lawsuit against Kalshi over sports contracts is before the state's Supreme Judicial Court, which is reviewing a lower court's decision against Kalshi. We couldn't confirm from a court record what that decision currently requires of Kalshi. Other platforms have federal suits against the state, and we found no ruling in them.
Does the court fight change how my trades are taxed?
No. These cases decide whether a state can license or stop the platforms. None of them decides how your trades are taxed, and trades you already made still count in your tax year.