Kalshi and prediction markets in Indiana: taxes and legal status
Indiana taxes gambling winnings and prediction market profits as income (2.95% flat). It doesn't let you deduct gambling losses, so gambling winnings are taxed in full on your state return.
As of October 27, 2026, we found no lawsuit, order, letter or law from Indiana aimed at prediction market platforms. Where it stands
Checked October 27, 2026 against Indiana’s tax department, court dockets and regulator records.
Indiana at a glance
- Income tax
- 2.95% flat
- Gambling losses
- No
- 2026 federal 90% rule
- No state income tax
- Prediction markets
- No state action found
Income tax
How does Indiana tax gambling and prediction market winnings?
Indiana's flat income tax rate is 2.95% for 2026, according to the Tax Foundation.
Gambling losses
Can you deduct gambling losses in Indiana?
Indiana doesn't allow a deduction for gambling losses. Losses you claimed on your federal return can't be claimed on your Indiana return.
- It is unclear whether Indiana follows the federal 90% gambling-loss limit from 2026.
Legal status
Is prediction market trading legal in Indiana?
As of October 27, 2026, we found no lawsuit, order, letter or law from Indiana aimed at prediction market platforms. No federal case involving a prediction market operator names Indiana officials.
Federal courts
What the federal courts and the CFTC have said
States say prediction market sports contracts are bets that their gambling laws cover, while Kalshi and the CFTC say they are swaps, a kind of derivative that only the federal Commodity Exchange Act and the CFTC regulate. The Third Circuit appeals court sided with Kalshi against New Jersey in April 2026, while the Ninth Circuit (Nevada, August 2026) and the Sixth Circuit (Ohio and Tennessee, September 2026) ruled for the states, all at the preliminary stage. The Fourth Circuit (Maryland) heard argument in May 2026 and had not ruled as of October 27. New Jersey's petition to the Supreme Court, Flaherty v. KalshiEX (No. 26-299), is waiting on Kalshi's response due November 9, 2026, and the Court has not yet said whether it will hear the case. On October 9, 2026 the CFTC proposed a rule defining event contracts as swaps.
Apr 6, 2026
Court · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · KalshiEX LLC v. Flaherty (No. 25-1922)
By a 2-1 vote, the appeals court for New Jersey, Pennsylvania and Delaware upheld an order that stops New Jersey from enforcing its gambling laws against Kalshi's sports contracts for now. It found Kalshi likely to win its argument that federal law overrides the state. This is a preliminary ruling, not a final judgment.
Third Circuit opinion, Apr. 6, 2026Aug 28, 2026
Court · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · KalshiEX LLC v. Assad (No. 25-7516)
A unanimous three-judge panel upheld the order that lifted Kalshi's protection against Nevada, so Nevada may enforce its gambling laws against Kalshi's sports contracts. The court held that sports contracts are not swaps under federal law. It sent Kalshi's election contracts back to the district court. This is a preliminary ruling.
Ninth Circuit opinion, Aug. 28, 2026Sep 2, 2026
Court · Supreme Court of the United States · Flaherty v. KalshiEX, LLC (No. 26-299)
New Jersey asked the Supreme Court to review the Third Circuit ruling. Kalshi's response is due November 9, 2026 after an extension. Many states, tribes, the NFL and others have filed friend-of-the-court briefs. The Court has not decided whether to take the case.
Supreme Court docket No. 26-299Sep 16, 2026
Court · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Blue Lake Rancheria v. Kalshi, Inc. (No. 25-7504)
In a case brought by two California tribes, the court held the tribes are likely to win their claim that Kalshi's sports contracts offered on tribal lands break the federal Indian Gaming Regulatory Act, and sent the case back to the lower court. A Lanham Act (false advertising) claim was rejected.
Ninth Circuit opinion, Sept. 16, 2026Sep 25, 2026
Court · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · KalshiEX LLC v. Schuler (Ohio) and KalshiEX LLC v. Orgel (Tennessee) (Nos. 26-3196 and 26-5235)
A unanimous panel upheld a federal judge's refusal to block Ohio's gambling laws and threw out the order that had protected Kalshi in Tennessee. It held Kalshi's sports contracts are not swaps and, even if they were, federal law does not override the states' gambling laws. The cases go back to the lower courts.
Sixth Circuit opinion, Sept. 25, 2026Oct 9, 2026
Regulator · Commodity Futures Trading Commission
The CFTC proposed a rule that would expressly define event contracts, including those on sports, politics, culture and weather, as swaps, which would place them under federal rather than state oversight. The public may comment for 30 days after Federal Register publication (91 FR 66022). It is a proposal, not a final rule. The same day the CFTC issued an interim rule excluding casino-style gambling products, such as sportsbook wagers and casino games, from the swap definition (91 FR 65969).
CFTC press release 9310-26, Oct. 9, 2026Oct 26, 2026
Court · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · KalshiEX LLC v. Martin (Maryland) (No. 25-1892)
No ruling yet. The appeal was argued May 7, 2026 and the parties were still filing supplemental authorities on Oct. 26, 2026.
CourtListener docket, Fourth Circuit No. 25-1892
Your trades
Kalshi and Polymarket profits in Indiana
The IRS hasn’t said how prediction market trades are taxed, so you pick one of four federal methods: capital gains, ordinary income, gambling or Section 1256. Indiana starts from your federal figures, so the method you choose federally generally carries onto your state return. If you report as gambling, the loss rules above apply. The four methods, compared.
Questions
Questions about Indiana
- Does Indiana tax gambling winnings?
- Indiana taxes gambling winnings and prediction market profits as income (2.95% flat). It doesn't let you deduct gambling losses, so gambling winnings are taxed in full on your state return.
- Can I deduct gambling losses in Indiana?
- Indiana doesn't allow a deduction for gambling losses. Losses you claimed on your federal return can't be claimed on your Indiana return.
- Is Kalshi legal in Indiana?
- As of October 27, 2026, we found no lawsuit, order, letter or law from Indiana aimed at prediction market platforms. No federal case involving a prediction market operator names Indiana officials.
- Does the court fight change how my trades are taxed?
- No. These cases decide whether a state can license or stop the platforms. None of them decides how your trades are taxed, and trades you already made still count in your tax year.
States with the same rule on losses: Kansas, Louisiana, Ohio, Rhode Island, Vermont, Wisconsin. All states.
Tax facts checked against Indiana’s own tax pages on October 27, 2026; legal status on October 27, 2026. Rules and cases change, so confirm with current instructions before you file.
See your own year four ways
WagerMints prices your Kalshi or Polymarket year under all four federal methods, side by side, so you can see what Indiana is taxing before you file. Free, no account.
Run your reportTax sources
- Indiana DOR, Individual Income Tax FAQs (seen via search excerpt; page blocked for me)
- Indiana DOR, Departmental Notice 16 (gaming withholding) (seen via search excerpt)
- Indiana DOR, Tax Chapter for the 2025 filing year (rate schedule) (seen via search excerpt)
- Indiana DOR, 2025 IT-40PNR instructions (casino income not deductible for nonresidents) (seen via search excerpt)
- Indiana Legislative Services Agency fiscal note, SB 243 (2026), withholding threshold
- Tax Foundation, 2026 state income tax rates (secondary)
- Bloomberg Tax / payroll.org on county rates (secondary)
- Bloomberg Tax, Indiana DOR allows nonresident to net gambling losses per session (secondary, paywalled)
- Indiana Department of Revenue, Individual Income Tax FAQs ("Can I claim a gambling loss...on my state return? No.")